At its simplest, an energy diverter captures excess energy from your private generation system, whether it is photovoltaic, wind or hydro, and uses it locally instead of allowing it to be exported to the grid. The most popular use is for water heating, though there are also examples of use for space heating and battery charging.
Whether you will benefit from a diverter depends wholly on the local rules that apply, and on the difference between the price that you pay for imported energy and the payments you receive for exported energy.
In the UK, there is a fixed “Feed-in Tariff” paid for energy generated irrespective of whether it is consumed on-site or exported. Although your exported energy may be purchased by the supplier at a rate lower than the one they charge for energy you import, there is often an assumption that 50% of generated energy is exported and payment is made on that basis. Therefore, it makes economic sense to utilise as much of the generated energy as possible, exporting only when no more can be used.
There is no consistent world-wide policy. In some places, it has been reported that exporting electricity is forbidden. In those locations, it is imperative that as much energy is used on-site as possible. Elsewhere, the same tariff rates apply to both imported and exported energy and there is no Feed-in Tariff, hence, no incentive to store energy on-site.
More on FIT: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feed-in_tariff
An energy diverter works by measuring the nett energy flow at the grid connection point, and controlling a load – usually a water heater – such that energy is neither imported nor exported. The method of control can be burst mode, phase control or pulse width modulation. These work by switching the power to the load on and off. The difference is the rate at which switching takes place.
The power is switched on and off relatively frequently, the minimum ‘on’ or ‘off’ time may be only a few milliseconds. There is no maximum.
This is the mode generally preferred by amateur constructors. The switching device is an inexpensive triac that requires only a small heat sink. A low-powered microcontroller is capable of performing the necessary calculations and generating a control signal. The load is switched at the instant the mains voltage passes through zero, so little or no interference is generated. However, the varying load on the supply may cause the supply voltage to rise and fall in time with the load switching, giving rise to flicker. This can be disturbing and must be minimised. Flicker is worst with a weak supply and a large load.
Switching takes place at mains frequency, the ‘on’ time can vary from zero to the whole mains cycle. The switching device is again, an inexpensive triac. The load always switches off at the point where the mains voltage passes through zero. But the load can be switched on at any point in the cycle, and the resulting voltage transient can generate harmonics that can cause undesirable heating in motors and generally interfere with a wide range of equipment. Heavy and expensive filters are required to keep the harmonics within acceptable limits, making this approach less popular than the others.
Switching takes place many tens of times each mains cycle. Again, the ‘on’ time can vary from zero to the whole of the switching period.
A pair of high voltage, high current MOSFET or IGBT transistors are the switching elements. Fine control requires very short 'on' and 'off' times. Filters are required to remove switching transients, but because of the higher frequencies involved, they can be made much smaller than those used with the phase controlled mode. Although there is at least one commercial PWM system on the market, we aren't aware of any constructor built systems.
More on phase control & burst mode:
The energy diverter can be divided into two sections, the input and the control logic that runs at low voltage, and the power switch that handles the load switching, which runs at mains voltage.
For the low voltage section, the choices are:
For the mains section, the choices are:
The application of the Arduino Uno and the emonTx V2 and the construction of a home-built switch are described in Diverting surplus PV Power, by Robin Emley. Robin is able to supply a range of items, from various special items, to a complete complete kit of parts, or the same design as a finished, tested unit, ready to be installed. [MK2PVRouter.co.uk]
A slightly different power switch is described by Martin Roberts here: Diverting surplus PV Power: PLL
Both of the power switches are suitable for use with an emonTx V2 or Arduino Uno. For the emonTx V3 using the ac adapter as the power supply, the circuit below must be used due to the limited current available from the rectifier circuit (note the use of the more sensitive MOC3043M and the increased value of the series resistor). For this reason, operation of the emonTx V3.4 with the RFM69CW radio module is not guaranteed.
Care must be taken when choosing a commercial SSR. Apart from the danger of purchasing a sub-standard and potentially dangerous low-cost device from on-line suppliers, care should be taken (especially if you are using an emonTx) to ensure that the SSR can de driven properly by the 3.3 V emonTx output. Problems are less likely if you use an Arduino, as its 5V output will normally drive an SSR without issue.
It will often be necessary, or desirable, to locate the power switch close to the load whilst the control logic is located close to the infeed. A very easy way to do this is to run a twisted pair (e.g. ‘telephone’ or CAT5 cable) between the two locations. A cable run of a few tens of metres should not be a problem.
Alternatively, a remote load can be controlled via radio – already available in the emonTX.
Sometimes there is a requirement to be able to control more than one load. As alluded to above, the emonTx V3 will not be suitable to drive a hard-wired second load if powered by the ac adapter. An external 5 V supply must be provided if more than one power switch is to be driven at the same time. The emonTx V2 and Arduino Uno do not suffer from this restriction. Both emonTx v2 and v3 can use their on-board RFM12B radio to control one or possibly more remote loads.
There are two principal published sources of control software: